Two things are happening in Australian retail at the same time, and they’re connected in a way that’s worth understanding properly.
Governments in New South Wales, Victoria, and the Australian Capital Territory have all moved — or are moving — to introduce tougher penalties for retail crime and stronger protections for frontline workers. At the same time, research from Monash University suggests a meaningful shift in how everyday Australians view theft itself, with younger consumers markedly more likely to see certain forms of retail theft as justifiable than older generations.
Read separately, these look like two unrelated stories — one about law, one about culture. Read together, they describe a retail environment where the legal consequences of theft and worker harm are getting more serious at exactly the moment when a portion of the public is becoming more accepting of the behaviour the law is trying to deter.
For retailers, property managers, and centre operators, both halves of this story matter for how you think about staff safety, evidence, and documentation going forward.
A Legal Landscape That’s Changing Fast
The legislative response to rising retail crime has moved quickly over the past year, and it looks different in every state.
New South Wales
NSW created three new offences in 2023 specifically covering harassment, stalking, or assault of a retail worker, with penalties of up to 11 years’ imprisonment for the most serious category. Since then, 192 individuals have been charged with 242 offences under these provisions, with 41 receiving custodial sentences.
The NSW Government has also begun consultation on Workplace Protection Orders — court orders that can ban a specific individual from entering a particular premises following violent or threatening conduct toward staff. This model builds on a retail crime strategy NSW Police announced in late 2025 targeting repeat and serious offenders specifically.
Victoria
Victoria has moved further and faster than any other state. New laws create a specific indictable offence for assaulting or threatening a customer-facing worker, carrying penalties of up to 5 years’ imprisonment, with separate lower-level summary offences carrying up to 6 months for threatening or intimidating conduct.
Ram raids — using a vehicle to force entry into a premises — have been reclassified as aggravated burglary, carrying a maximum penalty of 25 years’ imprisonment, and serious or repeat offending now falls under Victoria’s Adult Time for Violent Crime provisions regardless of the offender’s age.
The scale of the problem in Victoria explains the urgency. The state accounts for roughly a third of all reported retail crime incidents nationally, and retail crime incidents there rose more than 20% in a single year.
Australian Capital Territory
The ACT already has Workplace Protection Orders in operation, and the data emerging from the territory illustrates why. Woolworths alone recorded more than 150 violent incidents across its ACT stores in 2025, out of more than 7,000 reported nationally across the retailer’s network.
Breaching a Workplace Protection Order in the ACT carries penalties of up to $75,000 in fines and 5 years’ imprisonment — among the most serious consequences of any jurisdiction in the country for this category of offence.
The Cultural Shift Nobody’s Talking About
While legislators have been toughening penalties, research from Monash Business School’s Australian Consumer and Retail Studies unit has surfaced a very different trend running in the opposite direction — a shift in how ordinary Australians think about theft itself.
The research found that more than 1 in 4 Australians (27%) now view taking an item without paying for it as justifiable to some degree. The generational divide is stark: 54% of Australians aged 18 to 34 view this behaviour as justifiable to some extent, compared to just 7% of those aged 55 and over.
This isn’t a story about a small fringe of shoplifters. It describes a meaningful and growing segment of the shopping public holding a materially different view of where the ethical line sits — a view shaped, at least in part, by cost-of-living pressure and a sense of financial strain.
For retailers, this matters practically. Security and loss prevention strategies built purely around deterrence and enforcement are addressing the legal and financial consequences of theft. They’re not addressing the underlying shift in how a meaningful share of shoppers — particularly younger ones — currently rationalise that behaviour to themselves. Both halves of the problem need attention, and neither one is solved by the other.
What This Means for Retailers and Property Managers
Put together, these two trends point toward a few practical conclusions worth acting on now rather than later.
Staff safety is now a harder legal obligation, not a soft commitment. With new indictable offences, custodial sentencing, and Workplace Protection Orders now active or imminent across multiple states, businesses have a stronger case — and a stronger obligation — to invest properly in the security and evidentiary infrastructure that supports these outcomes. Under work health and safety law, a business that hasn’t reasonably equipped its site to protect staff from foreseeable violence carries meaningful exposure, independent of what happens to the offender.
Evidence quality matters more than ever. With custodial sentences and serious charges now genuinely on the table in multiple states, the quality of footage and documentation a business can provide directly affects whether a prosecution succeeds. A camera system that technically “has coverage” but doesn’t produce clear, usable evidence of an incident is a weaker asset than it looks on paper.
Deterrence and de-escalation both need attention. With a growing share of the shopping public viewing some theft as justifiable, security approaches built solely around catching and punishing offenders are addressing only one half of the problem. Staff training in de-escalation, clear signage, and a visible security presence all play a role that pure technology deployment doesn’t replace.
The regulatory direction is consistent, even if the pace differs by state. Victoria, NSW, and the ACT are all moving in the same direction — tougher penalties, more formal protection mechanisms for workers, and growing recognition that retail crime carries real cost beyond stock loss. Businesses reviewing their security posture now are aligning with where the law is clearly heading, not reacting to an isolated state-specific change.
See More. Respond Faster. Stay Secure.
If you’re reviewing your security setup, staff safety protocols, or evidence quality in light of the current legal and cultural landscape, we’re happy to walk through what’s realistic and proportionate for your business.
No obligation, no lock-in, honest advice.
Legislative information sourced from the NSW Department of Communities and Justice, the Victorian Government, and reporting by The Canberra Times. Cultural attitude research from Monash Business School’s Australian Consumer and Retail Studies unit.
Alphalogix is a Sydney-based managed IT company.
